The Trap of Believing Experience = Degree

You navigate the job boards on Indeed, Monster, or LinkedIn—searching for the perfect job that matches your qualifications. You review the responsibility section to see if you can execute the role, and then the infamous qualifications section—the part that determines if you should even apply. It says “bachelor’s degree or equivalent experience.” You don’t have a degree, but you have over a decade and a half of experience you believe can substitute for one, so you confidently hit the apply button. Weeks go by, and the call never comes—not just for this job, but for the other one hundred applications you submitted.

It’s been said for years that “degrees don’t hold as much weight as they used to,” and you may have bought into that idea. But HR uses this phrase to avoid appearing discriminatory toward non-degreed candidates, keeping the language broad and appealing. The reality is that a degree is still the baseline filter. It signals the appearance of discipline, trainability, and credibility. The degree doesn’t even need to be relevant—it’s simply the easiest way to narrow the pool. Non-degreed candidates often assume their experience will be enough to get them through the door. But the system was never designed to let many of them through.

A non-degreed candidate with “equivalent experience” can be hired, but it requires exceptional leverage—like a standout portfolio, niche expertise, or a direct connection—just to compete with a degree holder. And the higher the quality of competition, the more the degree outranks experience and becomes the gatekeeper. But the real challenge isn’t the degree itself—it’s the invisible systems. These are the unspoken rules of how decisions are made, woven into hiring practices to produce consistent, predictable outcomes.

The “equivalent experience” clause is less about truth and more about optics—an initiation ritual, more akin to joining a fraternity than proving ability.

In reality, employers know that most roles can be trained on the job. Yet their hiring practices rarely match what’s written in job descriptions. Instead, they rely on degrees as a shortcut to simplify the process. In the corporate world, credential bias becomes the proxy for quality, signaling that candidates have “played the game” to get in the door. During my tenure in operations, I’ve seen highly capable people overlooked while less-skilled candidates were chosen simply because they had the credential. The “equivalent experience” clause is less about truth and more about optics—an initiation ritual, more akin to joining a fraternity than proving ability.

So, experienced candidates have this illusion surrounding multiple pathways to obtain highly sought-after positions or jobs in saturated markets. Then the constant narrative spreading that “degrees aren’t what they used to be” — it gives you confidence and a sense of liberation believing your experience will give you the same chance. Yes there is a chance, and there are multiple pathways to success. But when it comes to the hiring process, the degree still dominates.

The data speaks for itself. People with degrees get more jobs, more opportunities, and higher pay. The unemployment rate for degree holders is 2.5%, compared to experienced non-degree holders hovers closer to 4%. That’s not a coincidence — it proves that hiring tilts heavily toward credentials, even when postings say “equivalent experience.”

Non-degree candidates aren’t cut out entirely, but they face higher risk: lower wages, higher unemployment, and less stability. This means you can gain years of experience, skills, and certifications — believing it holds the same weight as a degree, only to find out it doesn’t. In some industries it may, but most times it won’t.

The unspoken truth is that as a non-degree candidate, you need multiple leverage points and layered strategies just to compete, especially now that recruiters and AI software act as gatekeepers to employers. The real danger is ending up on the wrong path: walking for years toward a goal that was never designed to lead you there. To choose the easiest path and maximize results, you have to understand what’s truly required to reach the outcome. If a degree increases your probability of success, then make the sacrifice and get it. If you’re not willing to make the sacrifice—change the blueprint. Otherwise, you risk dedicating 20 years of your life to a path that was only ever going to allow you to work for the person who achieved what you were seeking.

‍